Hreflangs work well only if they are implement globally and globally refer to each other, from Polish to English – from English to Polish – from Czech to English and so on. In the example: semahead.agencyen refers in hreflang to semahead.agencyen and vice versa, : the website semahead.agencyen must refer to semahead.agency – only then the hreflang is implement correctly. Network of mutually referring hyperlinks, otherwise they may be ignor by Google. This is the most common mistake when implementing hreflangs – implementing the hreflang only one way and no return tag. It is worth setting x-fault to indicate the most popular language, the one that will be display to people from countries whose language we have not prepar.
There is content that is in a specific
For Europe, English will be the best option as it is currently the most international language. semaead offer Hreflang vs canonical: is it the same? Of course not. Using the canonical we indicate the home page, which is the original content and the only one that Google should inx. In the case of hreflangs, there is no “original” content. Language, thus it is adapt to a specific Luxembourg Phone Number List market. How to check the implementation of the hreflang attribute? The fastest option is to crawl with a tool call Screaming Frog.
The implementation of hreflangs
After performing the crawl, we go to the “hreflangs” tab, where charts are present with tail subpages with correctly implement hreflangs, with omitt ones, they will list subpages where x-fault has not been implement and whether the entire scheme has been implement correctly. In the tool it looks like this:SEO blog Summary Hreflangs do not directly affect SEO – they are not a ranking factor, but they are important in the context of website reception. Makes Google better unrstand who the page is intend for, it does not categorize it as a Bulk Lead duplicate, and shows it to the right target group.